migue98
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
|
Post by migue98 on Jun 4, 2021 8:36:49 GMT
Hi, this is my first thread, I hope you could answer to this as we already know, There are just a few days until the 44th anniversary of those two magnificent and spectacular concerts at the Earls Court, and even though there has not been an official launch of those concerts, since at Queen the Great, they talked about the Hyde Park concert. but they jumped from 1976 to 1977 in the NOTW era, they skipped the part of talking about Earls Court, I've always been curious because Brian and Roger in all the documentaries that there have been of Queen never talk about those two concerts, they show very few images, yes, but they don't talk about the concerts as such. I do not understand, if it is one of the best concerts of Queen after Hammersmith and Montreal. as a consequence of that I have created my own theories as to why they have not made an official Earls Court release. One of them is because as you have been noticed in the bootleg versions of vhs and antidens, at the end of each song; The image turns dark, (example: the camera is turned off when tie your mother down is about to end and it turns on again when ogre battle starts), it is as if they had paused and at the beginning of another song they turned it on again. Again, I do not know if that defect is in the video tapes that QPL owns. The other one is now with professional audio (multitrack), I feel like they were planning to launch those concerts years later, but the sound engineers did not realize that they did not press the record button, in order to start recording the audio and they realized in the middle of the concert and logically only half of the concert of the 1st night was recorded, something similar to what happened in knebworth '86 but with the video. error that would not be repeated on the 2nd and last night of the race tour. Another is the one that we have all had and is the failure of Freddie's microphone in several songs from the 1st night such as: 1- tie your mother down 2- ogre battle 3- death on two legs 4- '39 5- Bohemian rhapsody That would not be an excuse to release the concerts, they could be patched with the audio of other concerts such as Copenhagen, Inglewood or Bristol. Anyway, all the fans are in one way or another disappointed or sad, cos queen did a re-release of greatest hits, and it is sad since they publish and talk about the same thing Always Hammersmith rainbow greatest hits Budapest Hammersmith rainbow Hammersmith rainbow Enough! : '( fans want to see something new, fans want to see: official hyde park, official earls court, official Houston 77, official paris 79, some live album from other tours, as well as live killers. Forgive me if I get excited, but it is that if it makes me sad not to see some new audiovisual material of my favorite band since I can remember. I love the Hammersmith, rainbow, Budapest, Montreal concerts. but we already know a lot about those concerts.  I hope and take the time to read this, it is something that I have wanted to say for a long time, I love you Queen fans |
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator 
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 11,243
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Jun 4, 2021 9:22:31 GMT
Hi, this is my first thread, I hope you could answer to this as we already know, There are just a few days until the 44th anniversary of those two magnificent and spectacular concerts at the Earls Court, and even though there has not been an official launch of those concerts, since at Queen the Great, they talked about the Hyde Park concert. but they jumped from 1976 to 1977 in the NOTW era, they skipped the part of talking about Earls Court, I've always been curious because Brian and Roger in all the documentaries that there have been of Queen never talk about those two concerts, they show very few images, yes, but they don't talk about the concerts as such. I do not understand, if it is one of the best concerts of Queen after Hammersmith and Montreal. as a consequence of that I have created my own theories as to why they have not made an official Earls Court release. One of them is because as you have been noticed in the bootleg versions of vhs and antidens, at the end of each song; The image turns dark, (example: the camera is turned off when tie your mother down is about to end and it turns on again when ogre battle starts), it is as if they had paused and at the beginning of another song they turned it on again. Again, I do not know if that defect is in the video tapes that QPL owns. The other one is now with professional audio (multitrack), I feel like they were planning to launch those concerts years later, but the sound engineers did not realize that they did not press the record button, in order to start recording the audio and they realized in the middle of the concert and logically only half of the concert of the 1st night was recorded, something similar to what happened in knebworth '86 but with the video. error that would not be repeated on the 2nd and last night of the race tour. Another is the one that we have all had and is the failure of Freddie's microphone in several songs from the 1st night such as: 1- tie your mother down 2- ogre battle 3- death on two legs 4- '39 5- Bohemian rhapsody That would not be an excuse to release the concerts, they could be patched with the audio of other concerts such as Copenhagen, Inglewood or Bristol. Anyway, all the fans are in one way or another disappointed or sad, cos queen did a re-release of greatest hits, and it is sad since they publish and talk about the same thing Always Hammersmith rainbow greatest hits Budapest Hammersmith rainbow Hammersmith rainbow Enough! : '( fans want to see something new, fans want to see: official hyde park, official earls court, official Houston 77, official paris 79, some live album from other tours, as well as live killers. Forgive me if I get excited, but it is that if it makes me sad not to see some new audiovisual material of my favorite band since I can remember. I love the Hammersmith, rainbow, Budapest, Montreal concerts. but we already know a lot about those concerts. I hope and take the time to read this, it is something that I have wanted to say for a long time, I love you Queen fans Welcome to the forum. 🙂 My take on it is, possibly for the reasons you highlighted, it would be too much work to restore the EC video footage and audio into a releasable product, particularly of Brian's exacting standards. We all know QPL will take the easiest route to make a buck, and would rather recycle than create something 'new'. Other opinions may be forthcoming... |
|
Dimitris
Politician
Posts: 599
Likes: 394
|
Post by Dimitris on Jun 4, 2021 12:40:28 GMT
Earls court was about to be released in late 90s.
Like at BBC it was canceled, instead of that, EMI released Rocks, also Rocks 2 never happened as it was planned.
New record contracts are not the same as it was 20 years ago. Most contracts are for a catalogue of songs. In 2011 Queen signed for 3 years and about 200 songs. Record company decides how to use them.
|
|
pg
Queen Mab
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 1,618
|
Post by pg on Jun 4, 2021 16:24:16 GMT
They don't feel the projected sales justify the additional work needed to get it to a standard they deem acceptable.
|
|
ted
Ploughman
Cool.
Posts: 393 
Likes: 188
|
Post by ted on Jun 4, 2021 17:09:17 GMT
They don't feel the projected sales justify the additional work needed to get it to a standard they deem acceptable. I agree with this, and Lord Fickle's explanation further above. I have had a bootleg vid. of the EC performance(s) - including the 'camera blackouts' between songs - for close to 30 years. It would be very nice to have an official release, but it doesn't seem plausible.
Ted
|
|
georg
Global Moderator
wrote several books
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 1,768
|
Post by georg on Jun 4, 2021 19:21:29 GMT
Would’ve been nice as a bonus to an ADATR deluxe box set though…
EDIT: in that maybe QPL would’ve been more justified in going to the effort if it was part of a package instead of as a standalone release.
|
|
migue98
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
|
Post by migue98 on Jun 4, 2021 20:43:33 GMT
Would’ve been nice as a bonus to an ADATR deluxe box set though… EDIT: in that maybe QPL would’ve been more justified in going to the effort if it was part of a package instead of as a standalone release. I don't think so, BM and RT are a bit jealous with those files Although a live ADATR album would be very well received, with recordings of the Inglewood, Copenhagen, Bristol, Liverpool 1st and 2nd night concerts and obviously EC 1st and 2nd, it doesn't matter if there were wrong notes or voice errors, it doesn't matter. although it only remains to dream that one day to have an official release of those recordings |
|
migue98
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
|
Post by migue98 on Jun 4, 2021 20:50:34 GMT
They don't feel the projected sales justify the additional work needed to get it to a standard they deem acceptable. I agree with this, and Lord Fickle's explanation further above. I have had a bootleg vid. of the EC performance(s) - including the 'camera blackouts' between songs - for close to 30 years. It would be very nice to have an official release, but it doesn't seem plausible.
Ted
Why do you say that ?, I think a release of any archive from 1976 to 1978 would be very well received by fans |
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 11,243
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Jun 4, 2021 21:28:19 GMT
I agree with this, and Lord Fickle's explanation further above. I have had a bootleg vid. of the EC performance(s) - including the 'camera blackouts' between songs - for close to 30 years. It would be very nice to have an official release, but it doesn't seem plausible.
Ted
Why do you say that ?, I think a release of any archive from 1976 to 1978 would be very well received by fans That's the problem - QPL don't seem to think archive releases would be well received by fans, and that's why we don't get any. But, when they release a product like the NOTW box set, costing £100 (UK), which fans had to purchase complete to get one CD of interest, is it surprising they don't sell millions of these? Just give us bog standard properly mixed CDs of Houston, Hammersmith 1979, and several others you could name, and perhaps a tarted up (but standard) bluray of Earls Court, and I'm sure they would sell well. Why does everything have to be in a cost prohibitive lavish box set, with a load of reproduced tat that we don't want, or will only look at once? I had to buy NOTW on vinyl in the box set, and I haven't got a bloody record player! |
|
migue98
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
|
Post by migue98 on Jun 4, 2021 22:55:18 GMT
Why do you say that ?, I think a release of any archive from 1976 to 1978 would be very well received by fans That's the problem - QPL don't seem to think archive releases would be well received by fans, and that's why we don't get any. But, when they release a product like the NOTW box set, costing £100 (UK), which fans had to purchase complete to get one CD of interest, is it surprising they don't sell millions of these? Just give us bog standard properly mixed CDs of Houston, Hammersmith 1979, and several others you could name, and perhaps a tarted up (but standard) bluray of Earls Court, and I'm sure they would sell well. Why does everything have to be in a cost prohibitive lavish box set, with a load of reproduced tat that we don't want, or will only look at once? I had to buy NOTW on vinyl in the box set, and I haven't got a bloody record player! Like Hammersmith and rainbow, those concerts are available in fancy boxes, however, that is so outrageous, and I think the same as you, we just want the cd or blu ray and some mini book with a summary of that concert (this would still be acceptable), but not filler material that we are not interested in. in my case, I have never bought any article from QPL, and I will not do it until they publish something worthwhile |
|
ted
Ploughman
Cool.
Posts: 393
Likes: 188
|
Post by ted on Jun 5, 2021 1:13:52 GMT
Why do you say that ?, I think a release of any archive from 1976 to 1978 would be very well received by fans That's the problem - QPL don't seem to think archive releases would be well received by fans, and that's why we don't get any. But, when they release a product like the NOTW box set, costing £100 (UK), which fans had to purchase complete to get one CD of interest, is it surprising they don't sell millions of these? Just give us bog standard properly mixed CDs of Houston, Hammersmith 1979, and several others you could name, and perhaps a tarted up (but standard) bluray of Earls Court, and I'm sure they would sell well. Why does everything have to be in a cost prohibitive lavish box set, with a load of reproduced tat that we don't want, or will only look at once? I had to buy NOTW on vinyl in the box set, and I haven't got a bloody record player! I completely agree with Lord Fickle's reply. In the NOTW box set, for example, there's much included that fans generally don't need or want.
Ted
|
|
|
|
Post by Billblackman on Jun 5, 2021 2:11:15 GMT
Asking the question is answering it...
|
|
NathanH
Politician
Posts: 689
Likes: 708
|
Post by NathanH on Jun 5, 2021 8:49:06 GMT
I hope no-one will mind me posting this but it's an interesting little extract from the fan club magazine in Autumn 1994:  |
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator
Posts: 26,021
Likes: 11,243
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Jun 5, 2021 8:59:06 GMT
I hope no-one will mind me posting this but it's an interesting little extract from the fan club magazine in Autumn 1994: That basically bears out what we've been saying that QPL would consider it too much work to make it worthwhile. Even if they did patch it up, you would then get some fans complaining that it had been 'fixed', so either way they can't win. |
|
migue98
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
|
Post by migue98 on Jun 6, 2021 6:19:03 GMT
I hope no-one will mind me posting this but it's an interesting little extract from the fan club magazine in Autumn 1994: so, that means that the Queen fan club had almost direct contact with thew, or how? |
|
readyeddie
Dragonfly Trumpeter
Posts: 144
Likes: 117
|
Post by readyeddie on Jun 6, 2021 11:31:15 GMT
Hi, this is my first thread, I hope you could answer to this as we already know, There are just a few days until the 44th anniversary of those two magnificent and spectacular concerts at the Earls Court, and even though there has not been an official launch of those concerts, since at Queen the Great, they talked about the Hyde Park concert. but they jumped from 1976 to 1977 in the NOTW era, they skipped the part of talking about Earls Court, I've always been curious because Brian and Roger in all the documentaries that there have been of Queen never talk about those two concerts, they show very few images, yes, but they don't talk about the concerts as such. I do not understand, if it is one of the best concerts of Queen after Hammersmith and Montreal. as a consequence of that I have created my own theories as to why they have not made an official Earls Court release. One of them is because as you have been noticed in the bootleg versions of vhs and antidens, at the end of each song; The image turns dark, (example: the camera is turned off when tie your mother down is about to end and it turns on again when ogre battle starts), it is as if they had paused and at the beginning of another song they turned it on again. Again, I do not know if that defect is in the video tapes that QPL owns. The other one is now with professional audio (multitrack), I feel like they were planning to launch those concerts years later, but the sound engineers did not realize that they did not press the record button, in order to start recording the audio and they realized in the middle of the concert and logically only half of the concert of the 1st night was recorded, something similar to what happened in knebworth '86 but with the video. error that would not be repeated on the 2nd and last night of the race tour. Another is the one that we have all had and is the failure of Freddie's microphone in several songs from the 1st night such as: 1- tie your mother down 2- ogre battle 3- death on two legs 4- '39 5- Bohemian rhapsody That would not be an excuse to release the concerts, they could be patched with the audio of other concerts such as Copenhagen, Inglewood or Bristol. Anyway, all the fans are in one way or another disappointed or sad, cos queen did a re-release of greatest hits, and it is sad since they publish and talk about the same thing Always Hammersmith rainbow greatest hits Budapest Hammersmith rainbow Hammersmith rainbow Enough! : '( fans want to see something new, fans want to see: official hyde park, official earls court, official Houston 77, official paris 79, some live album from other tours, as well as live killers. Forgive me if I get excited, but it is that if it makes me sad not to see some new audiovisual material of my favorite band since I can remember. I love the Hammersmith, rainbow, Budapest, Montreal concerts. but we already know a lot about those concerts. I hope and take the time to read this, it is something that I have wanted to say for a long time, I love you Queen fans Welcome to the forum. 🙂 My take on it is, possibly for the reasons you highlighted, it would be too much work to restore the EC video footage and audio into a releasable product, particularly of Brian's exacting standards. We all know QPL will take the easiest route to make a buck, and would rather recycle than create something 'new'. Other opinions may be forthcoming... I thought they did quite well with the restorations that have been released so far from Earl's Court such as '39 at the Stormtroopers exhibition and Death On Two Legs in Rags To Rhapsody. I imagine it could be released some time next year or in 2027, after that, I'll lose all confidence! |
|
migue98
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
|
Post by migue98 on Jun 6, 2021 17:01:26 GMT
Welcome to the forum. 🙂 My take on it is, possibly for the reasons you highlighted, it would be too much work to restore the EC video footage and audio into a releasable product, particularly of Brian's exacting standards. We all know QPL will take the easiest route to make a buck, and would rather recycle than create something 'new'. Other opinions may be forthcoming... I thought they did quite well with the restorations that have been released so far from Earl's Court such as '39 at the Stormtroopers exhibition and Death On Two Legs in Rags To Rhapsody. I imagine it could be released some time next year or in 2027, after that, I'll lose all confidence! but, as you have seen in the previous answers, it is not easy to release a concert like Earls Court. it could not convince people, I know, I also find it difficult to accept it, but what else is left. BM & RT: IT'S SO EASY BUT WE CAN'T DO IT |
|
|
|
Post by mikusguitarius on Jun 8, 2021 0:12:45 GMT
My two cents...
1) Release a double CD (i.e. Audio release only) of Earls Court (can be mixed from 2 nights to patch holes from either night etc).
2) Put the best quality video (which isn't saying much!!) of either night (or both) on YouTube for free. That way they can't claim that it isn't of a good enough standard to officially release for sale.
3) The above two points will never happen....
|
|
chowder
Dragonfly Trumpeter
Posts: 143
Likes: 113
|
Post by chowder on Jul 5, 2021 16:15:29 GMT
I hope no-one will mind me posting this but it's an interesting little extract from the fan club magazine in Autumn 1994:
Nice info! Never knew that.
And related to the TS's question, I guess that they want to release only the best of the best as they are "Queen" after all, this ultimate & flawless band.
|
|
jlf
Satyr
Posts: 82
Likes: 109
|
Post by jlf on Jul 12, 2021 4:01:49 GMT
I remember this problem with the Earl's Court prospective release being reported in the FC magazine. The thing that I couldn't understand at the time and still can't is, Queen Productions obviously had a tape of Earl's Court that they allowed the fan club to play at the convention, and that tape seemed to be fine. That means Freddie's voice was recorded on the piano microphone, because it's on that tape.
So, why couldn't QPL use the tape that they gave the fan club to play as the basis for a new release....? Has nobody else wondered this?
Oh regarding the Queen Fan Club's contact with the band, while it was always a separate company they were always in contact with the band pretty directly over some things. QPL would report prospective releases to the fan club and there are pictures of Jacky with Freddie at his hat party, and I think she was at the Wembley aftershow party.
As far as autographed items are concerned... I'd be surprised if any record sleeve or photo sent from the fan club was ever autographed by any member of Queen, and I suspect that Jacky and her team practiced the band's autographs to be able to give the less keen-eyed fans a convincing enough experience of getting a Queen signature. It's a bit shit really since sometimes these 'authenticated' items would fetch high prices at auctions....
|
|
oreno
Ploughman
Posts: 269
Likes: 364
|
Post by oreno on Jul 12, 2021 10:54:49 GMT
It's a long time since I watched it on youtube but the Earl's Court footage and performance is brilliant, and I do not remember at any point Freddie's mic 'dropping out'. Is there any evidence of this? I do not disbelieve Jackie btw, just never understood that one.
In particular on the available footage, the sound mix is great, John's Music Man bass sounding amazing. I guarantee if it gets a release it will be compressed/eq'd to death like they did with Rainbow and Hammersmith, (and Wembley now I think of it) and John will again be buried/lost in the mix.
And I wouldn't be surprised if they were to master it from PAL to NTSC again, as with Rainbow, meaning the original bright video look/resolution is permanently lost and it feels like there's a haze filter over it.
Grumble, moan. I don't like what they do to 70s Queen concerts on video.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrmarioanonym on Jul 12, 2021 15:21:12 GMT
the video feed includes that vocal mic in the mix, but the multitrack doesn't is the way i understood it.
|
|
baronlutenvank
Ploughman
The Username Formerly Known as Killer_queenIII
Posts: 376
Likes: 263
|
Post by baronlutenvank on Jul 14, 2021 15:43:51 GMT
the video feed includes that vocal mic in the mix, but the multitrack doesn't is the way i understood it. Apparently, the piano vocal mic came out blank on the multis. What's messing my head for years is that this happened on both nights, like how could they make that same mistake twice? |
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,163
Likes: 3,412
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 14, 2021 15:47:26 GMT
the video feed includes that vocal mic in the mix, but the multitrack doesn't is the way i understood it. Apparently, the piano vocal mic came out blank on the multis. What's messing my head for years is that this happened on both nights, like how could they make that same mistake twice? i'd say that they had no idea anything was wrong until (much) later. so however they setup for 1st gig, things remained unchanged for 2nd. |
|
jlf
Satyr
Posts: 82
Likes: 109
|
Post by jlf on Jul 15, 2021 4:06:03 GMT
While we're on it, Magic Years Four became Champions of the World which was a kind of compressed Magic Years with the Made In Heaven update. I was always surprised that never got a DVD release, but then I suppose they've released These are the days of our lives documentary instead.
|
|
nickyt
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 19
Likes: 62
|
Post by nickyt on Jul 15, 2021 17:57:28 GMT
So with the Rare Live versions of Earl's Court content like You Take my Breath Away, and the Killer Queen Medley, are those just the video feed versions again? I thought those were taken from the multitrack. Even the Death on Two Legs in the Rags to Rhapsody documentary from EC is intact, none of these "drop outs" seen at all
|
|
pg
Queen Mab
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 1,618
|
Post by pg on Jul 15, 2021 21:48:24 GMT
You've answered your own question.
If multi has no piano Mike, but they've released snippets, then logically either
A) they just chucked out the stereo FOH mix.
B) they found some other source, mixed THAT, and synchronised it to the Earls Court footage.
C) they're lying about the dropout, despite having a record company begging for content (at the time)
|
|
|
|
Post by littlequeenie97 on Jul 15, 2021 22:51:11 GMT
Well, they used the piano mic for Bohrhap in the biopic movie, for the ending of the song
|
|
RedJohn
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 39
Likes: 36
|
Post by RedJohn on Jul 19, 2021 16:12:21 GMT
Well, they used the piano mic for Bohrhap in the biopic movie, for the ending of the song And that absolutely wouldn't work without Multitracks. We should also keep in mind that this fan club article is really old. Probably they found the complete masters sometime in the last 20 years. But then, why is there still no release? |
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,163
Likes: 3,412
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 19, 2021 18:02:10 GMT
They don't feel the projected sales justify the additional work needed to get it to a standard they deem acceptable. Well, they used the piano mic for Bohrhap in the biopic movie, for the ending of the song And that absolutely wouldn't work without Multitracks. We should also keep in mind that this fan club article is really old. Probably they found the complete masters sometime in the last 20 years. But then, why is there still no release? i don't understand why Queen fans (after all this time) still don't "get" QPL. As pg says above. it'll require hard work, so no, it probably won't happen. Before a project is given the green light, it has to pass a very simple test. here's a handy formula for any fans still wrestling with the will they/won't they conundrum (it can be applied to any suggested release): Rule 1: B > T Rule 2: R = 100xE Rule 3: M = 5xR B = Boredom Threshold (how long (months) before QPL will lose interest) T = Time to bring project to market (months) E = Effort/Work required by QPL (months) M = Potential Market (£1,000s) R = Initial Revenue (£1,000s) hope this helps  |
|
I hope and take the time to read this, it is something that I have wanted to say for a long time, I love you Queen fans
