scandal
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 36
Likes: 55
|
Post by scandal on Sept 23, 2024 12:37:56 GMT
People shat kittens over the tweaks to Live at the Rainbow, personally I couldn’t give a toss if they touch up a live album for the sake of a more polished listening experience. It’s not like overdubbing isn’t something that’s happened to a whole bunch of the most famous live albums ever released. Personally I thought Rainbow was the best thing Queen have put out in decades. Exactly. There's a whole Live Killers analasys on Bob's site, detailing all the cuts, edits, overdubbs, etc. This has been going on for decades. It's just that the technology has changed. I think the problem here is that when you touch up a product that is not good enough is one thing and when you try to touch up something that is already good enough is quite another. For me Freddie's vocals on the first album are not just good but great and don't require any tampering with.
|
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator
Posts: 26,095
Likes: 11,285
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Sept 23, 2024 13:04:43 GMT
Exactly. There's a whole Live Killers analasys on Bob's site, detailing all the cuts, edits, overdubbs, etc. This has been going on for decades. It's just that the technology has changed. I think the problem here is that when you touch up a product that is not good enough is one thing and when you try to touch up something that is already good enough is quite another. For me Freddie's vocals on the first album are not just good but great and don't require any tampering with. Which leads to the question as to why they did it? According to the video analasys, Freddie's vocal was almost perfect, but they must have had their reasons for putting it through the process.
|
|
ted
Ploughman
Cool.
Posts: 393
Likes: 188
|
Post by ted on Sept 23, 2024 13:54:23 GMT
When Queen went to Island...everything got reissued. When they went back to EMI / Universal.....everything got reissued. Sony's first order of business is not going to be archive releases, it will be something with mass appeal to start recouping the investment.. You are absolutely right about that...even in 1991, when Hollywood Records took over the rights from Capitol Records, the entire catalog was reissued. Sony will surely reissue the entire Queen studio/live catalog up to this point, but I think there will be some tasty releases in the near future. After all, the control of Brian, Roger, John and Freddie's estate after the dissolution of Queen Productions Ltd. should no longer affect future releases.
By the way, this 'Queen I? box set and all the products attached to it (CD, LP, picture disc and 7" single) are on the EMI label right? On the other hand, EMI Music Publishing has been owned by Sony Music Publishing for several years. It would be awesome if Sony added enough bonus tracks and additional packaging to each album they re-release to make it a worthwhile endeavour, but given the track record of those involved in previous Queen re-issues, I'm not very optimistic about that happening. Hollywood did add 1-3 bonus tracks to each album when they released Queen's back catalogue, but they were mostly remixes (some with 'additional production') which I didn't consider adequate. As has been mentioned before, I know that Sony has to consider the target customers and sales potential when considering reissuing the albums.
Ted
|
|
leighburne
Dragonfly Trumpeter
Posts: 178
Likes: 160
|
Post by leighburne on Sept 23, 2024 14:03:16 GMT
Don’t get me wrong, if they autotuned Freddie to sound like Cher singing “Believe”, I’d be annoyed. But (having not listened to the preview myself) I kinda doubt that’s the case.
|
|
|
Post by airpodsmax on Sept 23, 2024 14:58:23 GMT
It's probably good that they took Hangman from a concert that's not available on bootleg. The fact that there's no polar bear is of course bad, but maybe the track is either from a different year, or Tim Staffel didn't allow it. I'm not sure about the latter. I don't understand all this squabble over autotune. Well, they raised Freddie's voice by half a tone, but it didn't make him sing any worse. Moreover, maybe the situation required it. Moreover, the recordings are almost 50 years old.
|
|
merplot
Dragonfly Trumpeter
Posts: 174
Likes: 241
|
Post by merplot on Sept 23, 2024 15:38:19 GMT
People shat kittens over the tweaks to Live at the Rainbow, personally I couldn’t give a toss if they touch up a live album for the sake of a more polished listening experience. It’s not like overdubbing isn’t something that’s happened to a whole bunch of the most famous live albums ever released. Personally I thought Rainbow was the best thing Queen have put out in decades. Exactly. There's a whole Live Killers analasys on Bob's site, detailing all the cuts, edits, overdubbs, etc. This has been going on for decades. It's just that the technology has changed. It's one thing to add a vocal or use a different or new take or splice something in or whatever. Changing the fabric of the voice to sound like an android version of the singer is another issue entirely. It's not as heavy-handed here as it was with the Rainbow stuff (from what we can hear of the release at this point, anyways) but the original vocal take didn't need any "correcting". That's what galls me-- there was nothing wrong with the original vocal in the first place. They took something authentic and bent it in a weird direction... if it aint broke, don't fix it! All the pitch correction does is, ironically, date the release. That said, I am still excited about this release since everything else sounds fantastic.
|
|
scandal
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 36
Likes: 55
|
Post by scandal on Sept 23, 2024 15:51:29 GMT
I think the problem here is that when you touch up a product that is not good enough is one thing and when you try to touch up something that is already good enough is quite another. For me Freddie's vocals on the first album are not just good but great and don't require any tampering with. Which leads to the question as to why they did it? According to the video analasys, Freddie's vocal was almost perfect, but they must have had their reasons for putting it through the process. Don't ask me, cause I don't know. I can only assume they wanted it to sound "current". However, judging from replies here, for people who don't mind autotune these new vocals are not much different from older vocals, yet for people who care - this is quite detrimental. So overall the producers have gained nothing and yet aliented a part of fanbase, so a very dubious decision.
|
|
speedy
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 14
Likes: 27
|
Post by speedy on Sept 23, 2024 15:56:39 GMT
I gave the video another watch. The new sound continues to grow on me. But... What is supposed to be happening at 2:05? I don't mean to ask a stupid question like "please explain the art" but all I see is Elvis manifesting in the middle of a crowd. Is it supposed to be Freddie since it quickly cuts to Rainbow footage? What are your thoughts on what that is supposed to be? If I can add a little. Its a AI prompt and the prompt was a crowd scence etc etc and what it went into was a mess so it cut away to actual footage. I work a bit with AI images and if they used a actual photo from a queen concert or even just a crowd shot and then gave the last image as the first frame of Rainbow and let AI do it thing it would have come out a lot lot better - in fact you have given me an idea. You have to run loads and loads of prompts and images to get one that works well. In the defence of the person doing it I bet they ran many times with the photos and they then used the best of a bad bunch after many hours but to us as fans that know what queen look like they were still not good enough.
|
|
speedy
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 14
Likes: 27
|
Post by speedy on Sept 23, 2024 16:42:11 GMT
I gave the video another watch. The new sound continues to grow on me. But... What is supposed to be happening at 2:05? I don't mean to ask a stupid question like "please explain the art" but all I see is Elvis manifesting in the middle of a crowd. Is it supposed to be Freddie since it quickly cuts to Rainbow footage? What are your thoughts on what that is supposed to be? If I can add a little. Its a AI prompt and the prompt was a crowd scence etc etc and what it went into was a mess so it cut away to actual footage. I work a bit with AI images and if they used a actual photo from a queen concert or even just a crowd shot and then gave the last image as the first frame of Rainbow and let AI do it thing it would have come out a lot lot better - in fact you have given me an idea. You have to run loads and loads of prompts and images to get one that works well. In the defence of the person doing it I bet they ran many times with the photos and they then used the best of a bad bunch after many hours but to us as fans that know what queen look like they were still not good enough.
Okay so not being big headed 10 minutes and 2 images and oh how I would love a job doing the next Queen video. It not perfect but it makes more sense. But there is so much real footage not seen why do AI at all but anyway...
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Sept 23, 2024 16:54:25 GMT
Here's a guy showing the extent of pitch correction on the The Night Comes Down and speculating about why original take was a bit off, and proposing how fixing it could have been approached differently. That pitch correction is keeping me from being as excited as I could be about this release. It kills me. Why?? Why would they EVER think this is a good idea?! Why does anyone ever think using that stuff is a good idea? God I wish that stuff was never invented. Get excited. Our partner in crime manymilesaway has the wherewithal to create mixes with the original vocal and/or drums. I don't want to speak for him, but considering how quickly he did up his revised versions of The Night Comes Down, maybe he'll make this happen for the rest of the album, and then we will have the choice of which version to enjoy.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Sept 23, 2024 16:59:51 GMT
maybe the track is either from a different year, or Tim Staffel didn't allow it. I'm not sure about the latter. I'd imagine he wouldn't veto it, purely on the grounds of potential royalties. No doubt he earned a pretty penny from Doing All Right being on the biopic soundtrack.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Sept 23, 2024 17:04:04 GMT
That pitch correction is keeping me from being as excited as I could be about this release. It kills me. Why?? Why would they EVER think this is a good idea?! Why does anyone ever think using that stuff is a good idea? God I wish that stuff was never invented. With no disrespect to anyone's opinions, I really wish people weren't so hung up about it. I can only imagine what the comments on here will be when the album is released and it's taking all the joy out of what would otherwise be a fairly monumental release. People are going to comment on it - especially younger people who grew up with this technology and have ears like a bat for it. The genie is out of the bottle. It's not hard to make a file with the left and right channels being different versions of something, like we did a decade ago when autotune was found on the Hammersmith release. But unlike 2015, there are a metric ton more people who can now hear it without the reference point of a previous version. People deeply care about this, and I think it's great - it means this music is transcending generations. But of course I agree with your general sentiment. We can only hope that once we hear the studio outtakes and live tracks, that will be the dominating force of the conversation.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Sept 23, 2024 17:05:16 GMT
Which leads to the question as to why they did it? According to the video analasys, Freddie's vocal was almost perfect, but they must have had their reasons for putting it through the process. Don't ask me, cause I don't know. I can only assume they wanted it to sound "current". However, judging from replies here, for people who don't mind autotune these new vocals are not much different from older vocals, yet for people who care - this is quite detrimental. So overall the producers have gained nothing and yet aliented a part of fanbase, so a very dubious decision. And maybe this will be the wake up call for them, that plenty of these young fans they've gained from the biopic are able to detect autotune and AI as easily as you and I can walk down the street. Brian's Instagram was blowing up with comments about it, and no doubt he took notice and the feedback was forwarded. This release is no doubt going to be amazing, but this is a completely needless blemish on it that hopefully won't be repeated after this.
|
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator
Posts: 26,095
Likes: 11,285
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Sept 23, 2024 17:41:35 GMT
Don't ask me, cause I don't know. I can only assume they wanted it to sound "current". However, judging from replies here, for people who don't mind autotune these new vocals are not much different from older vocals, yet for people who care - this is quite detrimental. So overall the producers have gained nothing and yet aliented a part of fanbase, so a very dubious decision. And maybe this will be the wake up call for them, that plenty of these young fans they've gained from the biopic are able to detect autotune and AI as easily as you and I can walk down the street. Brian's Instagram was blowing up with comments about it, and no doubt he took notice and the feedback was forwarded.This release is no doubt going to be amazing, but this is a completely needless blemish on it that hopefully won't be repeated after this. I don't do Instagram, but out of interest, did he respond to any of those comments? I'd like to think he took the criticism positively.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Sept 23, 2024 18:24:52 GMT
And maybe this will be the wake up call for them, that plenty of these young fans they've gained from the biopic are able to detect autotune and AI as easily as you and I can walk down the street. Brian's Instagram was blowing up with comments about it, and no doubt he took notice and the feedback was forwarded.This release is no doubt going to be amazing, but this is a completely needless blemish on it that hopefully won't be repeated after this. I don't do Instagram, but out of interest, did he respond to any of those comments? I'd like to think he took the criticism positively. I didn't watch that carefully - but I read somewhere that he disabled comments on a post at one point, which clearly meant he noticed.
|
|
|
Post by saintjiub on Sept 23, 2024 19:41:44 GMT
Thanks for the info, as I just purchased the mp3 download. I also just purchased the 2017 "News" box set for $112.56 with free shipping. I still feel slightly guilty for purchasing the 2017 "News" box set for basically one useful CD, but the cost is well under $25 per disc for the real box set, so I do not feel like I have been price gouged. www.amazon.com/dp/B0758ZN38H?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title... only 13 left in stock currently. I just received the 2017 "News" box set today from Amazon ... currently Amazon is selling for it $161.76, so the $49.20 savings has me relieved that I actually bought it less than two weeks ago. Hopefully everything is in working order ....
|
|
kosimodo
Dragonfly Trumpeter
Posts: 176
Likes: 91
|
Post by kosimodo on Sept 23, 2024 19:56:06 GMT
I just cant listen to autotune. Makes me sick. Reason i dont listen to the radio anymore. No wonder Brian had a stroke. Autotuning Freddie. The most beautifull voice in the world. Be prepared for the new My Fairy King. Its gonna be awfull.
|
|
manymilesaway
Politician
Cookin' up remasters
Posts: 790
Likes: 2,388
|
Post by manymilesaway on Sept 23, 2024 20:14:16 GMT
Get excited. Our partner in crime manymilesaway has the wherewithal to create mixes with the original vocal and/or drums. I don't want to speak for him, but considering how quickly he did up his revised versions of The Night Comes Down, maybe he'll make this happen for the rest of the album, and then we will have the choice of which version to enjoy. Not only am I doing the entire album, I'm also going to do the De Lane Lea demos So stay tuned for that. *DLL demos might sound a little worse because the source is obviously not in the best of quality.
|
|
manymilesaway
Politician
Cookin' up remasters
Posts: 790
Likes: 2,388
|
Post by manymilesaway on Sept 23, 2024 20:15:45 GMT
No wonder Brian had a stroke. Autotuning Freddie. Sorry, that's fucked up. Pitch correction has literally been used on Queen releases for 20 years with 2004's Live At The Bowl. I don't like it either, but let's not use it to celebrate our beloved doctor's very serious medical issues.
|
|
|
Post by jjmillenium on Sept 23, 2024 20:27:34 GMT
No wonder Brian had a stroke. Autotuning Freddie. Sorry, that's fucked up. Pitch correction has literally been used on Queen releases for 20 years with 2004's Live At The Bowl. I don't like it either, but let's not use it to celebrate our beloved doctor's very serious medical issues. Isn't Wembley 92 the first time that they correct Freddie's voice? (With other techniques, obvously)
|
|
manymilesaway
Politician
Cookin' up remasters
Posts: 790
Likes: 2,388
|
Post by manymilesaway on Sept 23, 2024 20:56:59 GMT
Isn't Wembley 92 the first time that they correct Freddie's voice? (With other techniques, obvously) No, Live Killers was the first officially released correction of any live vocals... ... But, there was work on a Rainbow live album in 1975 (We know it as Sheetkeeckers today), so those would be the first overdubs in Queen history. But pitch correction and overdubs are two totally different things.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Sept 23, 2024 21:00:43 GMT
Get excited. Our partner in crime manymilesaway has the wherewithal to create mixes with the original vocal and/or drums. I don't want to speak for him, but considering how quickly he did up his revised versions of The Night Comes Down, maybe he'll make this happen for the rest of the album, and then we will have the choice of which version to enjoy. Not only am I doing the entire album, I'm also going to do the De Lane Lea demos So stay tuned for that. *DLL demos might sound a little worse because the source is obviously not in the best of quality. Soon to be determined - the fact that that they found the multi-track tapes is very promising. We may be in for a pleasant surprise.
|
|
katby
Satyr
Posts: 60
Likes: 112
|
Post by katby on Sept 23, 2024 21:10:15 GMT
Don't ask me, cause I don't know. I can only assume they wanted it to sound "current". However, judging from replies here, for people who don't mind autotune these new vocals are not much different from older vocals, yet for people who care - this is quite detrimental. So overall the producers have gained nothing and yet aliented a part of fanbase, so a very dubious decision. And maybe this will be the wake up call for them, that plenty of these young fans they've gained from the biopic are able to detect autotune and AI as easily as you and I can walk down the street. Brian's Instagram was blowing up with comments about it, and no doubt he took notice and the feedback was forwarded. This release is no doubt going to be amazing, but this is a completely needless blemish on it that hopefully won't be repeated after this. I completely agree with this. This feels like the first time that criticism has come from mainstream fans, as well as hardcore fans. Hopefully, they will listen to valid criticism this time. I only complain because I love Queen and want them to be the best they can be.
|
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator
Posts: 26,095
Likes: 11,285
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Sept 23, 2024 22:45:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Billblackman on Sept 23, 2024 22:49:51 GMT
I don't think I'll see a release on DVD/Blu Ray of the Innuendo videos and behind the scenes/interviews, etc. in my lifetime...and I'm only 44. Hello. I'm also 44 and I don't understand comments like the one you've written. Did you expect the Rainbow concert to be released? Did you expect songs from a 1970 concert to be released? Did you expect to hear 6 unreleased songs from the "The Miracle" sessions? Did you expect to hear "All dead, all dead" sung by Freddie? Did you expect to hear "Let me in your heart again?" I have no doubt that you will see the Innuendo videos on blu-ray. Kind regards. I hope so
|
|
|
Post by thesirhc on Sept 23, 2024 23:09:45 GMT
If I can add a little. Its a AI prompt and the prompt was a crowd scence etc etc and what it went into was a mess so it cut away to actual footage. I work a bit with AI images and if they used a actual photo from a queen concert or even just a crowd shot and then gave the last image as the first frame of Rainbow and let AI do it thing it would have come out a lot lot better - in fact you have given me an idea. You have to run loads and loads of prompts and images to get one that works well. In the defence of the person doing it I bet they ran many times with the photos and they then used the best of a bad bunch after many hours but to us as fans that know what queen look like they were still not good enough.
Okay so not being big headed 10 minutes and 2 images and oh how I would love a job doing the next Queen video. It not perfect but it makes more sense. But there is so much real footage not seen why do AI at all but anyway...
That's fantastic. Nice work!
|
|
manymilesaway
Politician
Cookin' up remasters
Posts: 790
Likes: 2,388
|
Post by manymilesaway on Sept 23, 2024 23:09:56 GMT
Not only am I doing the entire album, I'm also going to do the De Lane Lea demos So stay tuned for that. *DLL demos might sound a little worse because the source is obviously not in the best of quality. Soon to be determined - the fact that that they found the multi-track tapes is very promising. We may be in for a pleasant surprise. What I meant by the source is the original demos. I have no doubt that the remixes will sound fantastic, but flying in the original vocals won't be as easy as they're not in great quality.
|
|
merplot
Dragonfly Trumpeter
Posts: 174
Likes: 241
|
Post by merplot on Sept 23, 2024 23:26:52 GMT
And maybe this will be the wake up call for them, that plenty of these young fans they've gained from the biopic are able to detect autotune and AI as easily as you and I can walk down the street. Brian's Instagram was blowing up with comments about it, and no doubt he took notice and the feedback was forwarded.This release is no doubt going to be amazing, but this is a completely needless blemish on it that hopefully won't be repeated after this. I don't do Instagram, but out of interest, did he respond to any of those comments? I'd like to think he took the criticism positively. Last thing Brian needs right now is to raise his blood pressure. I doubt he took the time to answer anything (he rarely does anyway), but if he disabled the comments I'm sure the message was heard.
|
|
|
Post by pennyroyalty on Sept 24, 2024 9:02:56 GMT
I don't understand all this squabble over autotune. Well, they raised Freddie's voice by half a tone, but it didn't make him sing any worse. Moreover, maybe the situation required it. Moreover, the recordings are almost 50 years old. Each to their own, but all this squabble is because they tampered with individual notes rather than moving Fred's voice (i.e. entire vocal take) up indiscriminately, and the situation clearly did NOT require what they did. I get it that it might have bothered Brian or Roger for the last 50 years that the vocals are off-pitch on TNCD, but as the Wings of Pegasus video demonstrates shifting the entire vocal track up roughly by a quarter step or lowering the backing track by the same amount would do the job. This would be the modern equivalent of speeding up the tape to change pitch, although since you're doing it digitally you can do it to individual tracks and you can alter the pitch without affecting the speed. Perfect use of modern technology! Unfortunately, either it didn't occur to the people responsible for the new mix to try it or they had an idiot on board who managed to convince them otherwise. I know this is debatable, but to me this way of processing vocals makes Fred sound worse. His pitch on TNCD is spot on like it has never been on any other song in Queen's catalogue except for the official release of FIA, which was also corrected and which sounds equally robotic to me. On both he sounds as pitch-perfect as any given 21st-century pop singer on their studio recordings and the last thing Queen needs is to compete with those guys. And even if they wanted such competition pitch correction alone will not make the album sound modern. The main problem is that what you hear isn't effectively what Fred sounded like when singing. His vocals are mediated through an algorithm and/or a human deciding which notes to change, so that the outcome only partly reflects Fred's artistic decisions and vocal idiosyncrasies. Of course, if you raise the pitch of the entire vocal track the result will also be a departure from the original, but the nuances of articulation and phrasing, and the relative pitch fluctuations within the take will remain the same, so that it still sounds like him. Think of AOBTD, where the entire track was sped-up and sounds up a quarter step relative to what was played and sung in the studio, but Fred sounds as natural as on any other song. The comparisons to earlier tampering with performance quality on live tracks are not convincing to me. I am not going to defend the cut-and-paste work on Live Killers or doctoring other live recordings, but using this kind of selective pitch correction on a track that's been out there for 50 years is a whole new level of cheating combined with laziness.
|
|
|
Post by dragonkiller on Sept 24, 2024 11:20:10 GMT
That has got to be the wrong price! QOL shop has it at £19.99 + postage.
|
|