|
Post by ThomasQuinn on Jul 6, 2020 10:07:08 GMT
First off - I might be posting this in the wrong place. If so, apologies to the mods!
I really like this song. But something has always sounded a little off to me. Now, the whole Larry Lurex was an experiment by Trident's engineer, Mr. Cable, playing around with new techniques he'd learned about and trying to develop a new sound, partly based on the Phil Spector approach, so I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that all manner of tricks were attempted. I think "Going Back" may have been sped up.
Here are two versions of the track, one at regular speed, and one slowed down to shift the pitch down exactly one semitone. Have a listen to the 1:40-2:10 section for the vocals, and especially the solo piano right after that. To me, the timbre of the piano especially sounds much more natural once the pitch has been shifted down a semitone. What do the people here think?
|
|
Golden Salmon
Wordles & Heardles
Politician
Posts: 846
Likes: 860
|
Post by Golden Salmon on Jul 6, 2020 10:45:01 GMT
I am no expert and I could be completely wrong, but the pitch-corrected version seems to sound more natural. However, you didn't account for the tempo change and that version plays too slow. I lowered it a semitone down on Audacity while keeping the tempo and it sounds real enough. I also tried this with "I Can Hear Music" and it might be the same case. Here you have both versions: Larry Lurex tracks (1 semitone down, same tempo)
|
|
|
Post by ThomasQuinn on Jul 6, 2020 11:06:23 GMT
Thanks, Golden Salmon! I assumed that, if the pitch was in fact shifted in 1973, it would have been done by simply speeding up the tape, which would change both the pitch and the tempo, so I deliberately 'reversed' the hypothetical change in the same manner. I actually prefer Going Back running a little more slowly, but that's just personal preference, of course.
I hadn't yet tried it with I Can Hear Music, but the effect seems even more pronounced there, so I think you might well be right.
I do know that messing with tape speed was not that unusual in the '60s and '70s, especially speeding things up a little to apparently give more 'punch', I wonder if other ways of shifting pitch were also in use at the time?
|
|
Golden Salmon
Wordles & Heardles
Politician
Posts: 846
Likes: 860
|
Post by Golden Salmon on Jul 6, 2020 11:10:32 GMT
Oooh, you are right, they might have changed the pitch by altering the playback speed rather than through other techniques, so your version would accurately represent the actual original version. It sounded slow to me because I am used to the regular one, but you have a point.
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 6, 2020 11:13:11 GMT
I am no expert and I could be completely wrong, but the pitch-corrected version seems to sound more natural. However, you didn't account for the rhythm change and that version plays too slow. I lowered it a semitone down on Audacity while keeping the rhythm and it sounds real enough. I also tried this with "I Can Hear Music" and it might be the same case. Here you have both versions: Larry Lurex tracks (1 semitone down, same rhythm)but then some other things now sound a little off: ICHM ■ 01:03 - 01:07 - strings ■ 02:30 - 02:53 - guitar playback speed would definitely make a difference. but, how do the strings and guitars sound more natural in the faster original?
|
|
Golden Salmon
Wordles & Heardles
Politician
Posts: 846
Likes: 860
|
Post by Golden Salmon on Jul 6, 2020 11:19:47 GMT
Yeah, I am not the right person to judge that. I would love any musician here to share their opinion.
By the way, I just found out that Audacity translates "Tempo" as "Rhythm" to Spanish, which may not be correct. I am correcting that now.
|
|
|
Post by ThomasQuinn on Jul 6, 2020 11:22:52 GMT
We're waaaay into speculation territory here, but I could imagine those parts having been recorded at the 'final' pitch and mixed in with the already-sped-up remainder of the song. String parts would typically be one of the later things to get added. Mind you, I'm not saying this is what happened, or is even a likely scenario, simply that it's possible.
What do you think of the piano sound just after the 2:10 (slightly earlier in the 'official' version) mark, in Going Back, Brenski?
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 6, 2020 11:57:48 GMT
What do you think of the piano sound just after the 2:10 (slightly earlier in the 'official' version) mark, in Going Back, Brenski? i've always thought that Goin' Back had something out of place, now hearing a slightly-altered version, it accentuates two things (for me): Piano - sounds a little like the whole track was programmed on a Piano Roll but playback is too slow - even on the altered version. Vocals - Freddie's singing has gained a little of the Don't Stop Me Now (Live Killers) slurring. Also makes you realise just how great, Dusty Springfields and Carole King's (Writer) version really is. I'd love to find out more about that disputed version by the Gingerbreads.
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 6, 2020 13:45:23 GMT
apols for sidetracking a little: Been transcribing the lyrics of the different versions.
Although Carole King was a co-writer, with Gerry Goffin being the lyricist, we'll take the Dusty Springfield version as being the official. So, for the sake of argument. Goldie's release did pre-date Dusty but was withdrawn. I can see why Gerry Goffin insisted on it being withdrawn Goldie's version being a bit of a hack n slash. Carole's own recording was more in line with the Byrds cover. Key to lyrical changes: Dusty Goldie Byrds Carole King
I think I'm goin' back To the things I learned so well in my youth, I think I'm returning to Those days when I was young enough to know the truth (the)
Now there are no games To only pass the time No more colouring books (growing pain) (electric trains) (electric trains) No Christmas bells to chime (poems to write/rhyme?) (trees to climb) (trees to climb)
But thinking young and growing older (Lord knows) is no sin And I can play the game of life to win (love with you)
I can recall a time, When I wasn't ashamed to reach out to a friend And now I think I've got A lot more than just a skipping rope to lend (memory to end) (just my toys to lend) (just my toys to lend)
Now there's more to do Than watch my sailboat glide (Like be by my man's side) And everyday can be my magic carpet ride And I can play hide and seek with my fears (I'm starting to walk on back down that track) And live my days instead of counting my years (So catch me if you can - I'm goin' back (I'm goin' back), yeah.) (Goldie version ends here these two inserted lines) (A little bit of courage is all we lack) (A little bit of courage is all we lack) (So catch me if you can I'm goin' back) (So catch me if you can I'm goin' back) (Byrds and Carole King versions end with these two inserted lines)
Let everyone debate the true reality, I'd rather see the world the way it used to be A little bit of freedom's all we're lack So catch me if you can, I'm goin' back
So despite the many variations (there are more believe me) to the lyrics between 1966 and 1973, Freddie (Larry's) version is 100% loyal to Dusty's (original Goffin) lyrics. Hope this little sidetrack was interesting.
|
|
|
Post by ThomasQuinn on Jul 6, 2020 14:10:41 GMT
Wow. That's a pretty complete butchering of the lyrics there. The imagery is wrecked, the apparent meaning is dumbed down, the more philosphical contemplations are basically cut out, pretty much all the subtlety and ambiguity gone...whoever did that was certainly thorough. I can hardly imagine how Mr. Goffin must have felt when he was...subjected...to these lyrics.
Taking things back to the original subject - I'd like to ask you all to consider the word "games" at 0:37 (semitone down) and 0.35 (regular version). There's a pretty heavy vibrato on that word - kudos to Freddie if he could pull off what we hear in the regular version, but I think the vibrato in the version one semitone down sounds a lot more like the Freddie I know. But, hey, I could simply be hearing that *because* I've started to suspect that the slower speed is the 'real' speed. What do you think?
The line "to the things I learned so well" at 0:13/0:12 also, to me, sounds more like Freddie in the slowed down version.
|
|
|
Post by ThomasQuinn on Jul 6, 2020 14:30:25 GMT
What do you think of the piano sound just after the 2:10 (slightly earlier in the 'official' version) mark, in Going Back, Brenski? i've always thought that Goin' Back had something out of place, now hearing a slightly-altered version, it accentuates two things (for me): Piano - sounds a little like the whole track was programmed on a Piano Roll but playback is too slow - even on the altered version. Vocals - Freddie's singing has gained a little of the Don't Stop Me Now (Live Killers) slurring. Also makes you realise just how great, Dusty Springfields and Carole King's (Writer) version really is. I'd love to find out more about that disputed version by the Gingerbreads. I'm going to listen to DSMN from 'Killers' later with that in mind, thanks for the tip.
As for the piano, I think I sort of hear you about it sounding a little like a player piano - but don't you mean that it sounds like the piano roll is playing too *fast*? I'm pretty sure something has been done to alter the piano sound in some way but I have no idea what exactly, or whether it was done in the recording stage or afterward.
|
|
|
Post by master marathon runner on Jul 6, 2020 17:58:50 GMT
.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Wizard on Jul 6, 2020 21:08:44 GMT
The vocal is sped up for sure - a full step. The speed it's heard at at the tail end of Mother Love is the correct speed.
Jimmy Page was doing similar tricks around the same time, on The Song Remains The Same and No Quarter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2020 0:32:03 GMT
Yeah, to be honest, I always assumed it was sped up (the vocal, at least, and also probably the piano as it sounds a bit honky) and had that thought from day one. They were fond of experimenting and trying out odd things, it was largely their (Trident's) identity at the time.
|
|
Dimitris
Politician
Posts: 602
Likes: 404
|
Post by Dimitris on Jul 7, 2020 15:23:52 GMT
That's from Brian back in Feb 2020 for the Tribute of Robin. It is about all these Phil Spectror sound on Queen and Larry Lurrex songs.
So sad to hear of the passing of Robin Geoffrey Cable, talented Record Producer and Engineer, and an old friend.
Robin started his career as a ‘house engineer/producer’ at Trident Studios, the organisation which first signed Queen up for management, publishing and recording.
He, along with Roy Baker and Ken Scott took on the clients that used the studios and became a team with a kind of team spirit, I'd say, and they were responsible for the “Trident Sound” as heard on Robin’s work with Carly Simon, and Ken’s with David Bowie. Roy met with some resistance from us because we were looking for a much more ‘live' sound, and we got our way from the second album on, with his approval, and he eventually became known for live-sounding studio recordings.
But Robin actually gave Freddie (and me too) his first proper release on record. He was obsessed with the Phil Spector sound, and recreated it in his own way on recordings which he masterminded, of Spector’s song “I Can Hear Music” and Carole King’s “I’m Goin’ Back”. Robin had it all recorded but could not find a vocalist. He heard Freddie on the demos we were doing at a very early point, and asked Freddie to sing the tracks, which he did. He wanted a very ‘young’ sound, so he speeded up Freddie’s voice by recording it at a lowered tape speed. As I remember it, Robin was not happy with the solo section, so he invited me in to turn it into a guitar solo - which worked out very well. So then … what to call the artist for the release of the record ? Robin liked the idea of spoofing Gary Glitter and the Glam Rock movement, so he came up with “Larry Lurex” ! So in a sense our first ever release on vinyl was under the name "Larry Lurex”.
I do remember going to Robin when we were worried about the sound of our album when it was mastered. We thought it sounded too thin, and I remember Robin putting it through a graphic equaliser, and putting a little ripple in the frequency levels, up around 2k and down around 3K. It achieved just what we wanted. Robin had great ears - there is no question. We also considered asking him to produce our second Queen II album, and even got him to produce one track - "Funny How Love Is” - which we slotted into the album at the end of "The March of the Black Queen”. It, too, has Robin's take on the Phil Spector "Wall of Sound".
We used to see Robin frequently around Trident, but after his accident, he was much less communicative, and I got the impression he found life hard. And of course later on we had a bad falling out with Norman and Barry Sheffield, because they were holding us to a monstrously unfair deal, and we left, never to return, when Jim Beach negotiated us out.
So after that I didn't have any contact with Robin that I remember. I’m happy now to be in contact with his family, but I’m sad that it is under such sad circumstances.
RIP Robin Cable.
|
|
|
Post by mercurialfreddie on Jul 8, 2020 15:07:02 GMT
Few years ago I have written post on QZ about the same topic, even asking the wise members of the forum to analyze this matter more closely. I was sneered at and hardly anybody - except few people who have stated that speeding up the tape was a common practice in the late 60's - took me seriously. I strongly agree with most opinions in this thread, also as @the Real Wizard has said, near the end of the Mother Love track we can hear the correct speed. Would it be difficult with today's technology to reverse-engineer this song to hear it in correct speed and pitch ? @golden Salmon and thomas Quinn : Fantastic attempts!
|
|
Lord Fickle
Global Moderator
Posts: 26,321
Likes: 11,460
|
Post by Lord Fickle on Jul 8, 2020 17:14:53 GMT
Few years ago I have written post on QZ about the same topic, even asking the wise members of the forum to analyze this matter more closely. I was sneered at and hardly anybody - except few people who have stated that speeding up the tape was a common practice in the late 60's - took me seriously. I strongly agree with most opinions in this thread, also as @the Real Wizard has said, near the end of the Mother Love track we can hear the correct speed. Would it be difficult with today's technology to reverse-engineer this song to hear it in correct speed and pitch ? @golden Salmon and thomas Quinn : Fantastic attempts! Most audio editing software can do this, but with varying degrees of success, depending on the source material. I've found Adobe Audition generally produces quite good results, but haven't tried it with this.
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 8, 2020 17:43:25 GMT
I think the sped up (+1 semitone) may have helped to accentuate the WOS effect.
ICHM (when slowed) loses much of the ambient WOS (not so much Goin' Back). However, I've just slowed down FHLI and that -1 makes the WOS less effective. Once slowed down, it sounds less in your face.
...and on the subject of to speed/not to speed up.
Eddie Howell's Man From Manhattan sounds much better a semitone slower: the main vocals improve, Brian's guitar @1:23, @1:35 and from 1:49 sounds much more familiar. Freddie's "whoahs" from 1:45 sound richer.
|
|
Dimitris
Politician
Posts: 602
Likes: 404
|
Post by Dimitris on Jul 8, 2020 21:04:20 GMT
I think the sped up (+1 semitone) may have helped to accentuate the WOS effect. ICHM (when slowed) loses much of the ambient WOS (not so much Goin' Back). However, I've just slowed down FHLI and that -1 makes the WOS less effective. Once slowed down, it sounds less in your face. ...and on the subject of to speed/not to speed up. Eddie Howell's Man From Manhattan sounds much better a semitone slower: the main vocals improve, Brian's guitar @1:23, @1:35 and from 1:49 sounds much more familiar. Freddie's "whoahs" from 1:45 sound richer. That is good observation. I always found the sound of MFM little weird compare to Queen treatment and also You nearly did me in of Ian Hunder ( which I don't think it has been sped up). About FHLI I would love to hear a "speed corrected" since Freddie plays these beautiful chords on the piano and the backing vocals are really melodic and beutiful, but the speed up barriers them. Do you think that Sheer heart attack is also speed up? The leaked demo sounds more natural.
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 8, 2020 21:28:03 GMT
That is good observation. I always found the sound of MFM little weird compare to Queen treatment and also You nearly did me in of Ian Hunder ( which I don't think it has been sped up). About FHLI I would love to hear a "speed corrected" since Freddie plays these beautiful chords on the piano and the backing vocals are really melodic and beutiful, but the speed up barriers them. Do you think that Sheer heart attack is also speed up? The leaked demo sounds more natural. i take it you're referring to the "alternate version" as the demo? - the one with echos on the opening two lines? (mine is labelled "Wessex Sound Studios - August 1977") definitely more natural-sounding. odd thing is that, slower, the "punk" edge has gone, and it now sounds like a foretaste of grunge.
|
|
|
Post by staysweet on Jul 9, 2020 1:47:16 GMT
I had always thought that it was sped up and altered a bit, the sound gives it away. Interesting to hear how it might have been done, though.
|
|
Mjolnir
Banned
Tatterdemalion
Posts: 10
Likes: 4
|
Post by Mjolnir on Jul 9, 2020 2:38:02 GMT
This stopped down 1 semi-tone version seems like what was recorded. "Motherlove" version is lowered too much, probably to match Freddie's lower 80s voice.
|
|
|
Post by schmelvin on Jul 9, 2020 14:30:16 GMT
Interesting thread. I just remembered how these two songs were almost always in the wrong speed on 1990s bootleg CDs, particularily 'Queen in Nuce' and 'Pre Ordained'.
|
|
Golden Salmon
Wordles & Heardles
Politician
Posts: 846
Likes: 860
|
Post by Golden Salmon on Jul 9, 2020 16:25:53 GMT
This stopped down 1 semi-tone version seems like what was recorded. "Motherlove" version is lowered too much, probably to match Freddie's lower 80s voice. Yeah, that's what I always thought. They had altered the pitch to make his voice sound more mature rather than fixing the original recording. Interesting thread. I just remembered how these two songs were almost always in the wrong speed on 1990s bootleg CDs, particularily 'Queen in Nuce' and 'Pre Ordained'. 'Queen in Nuce' had a glitch on "Earth" that I still hear to this day when playing the properly mastered version. The same happens to me with a few old sources of some tracks, heh.
|
|
Dimitris
Politician
Posts: 602
Likes: 404
|
Post by Dimitris on Jul 10, 2020 9:31:34 GMT
I am wondering if AKOM original soundtrack version has also been sped up. Also it is like having a sound vocal effect like on Save me single.
The vocals of the album - single version are more agreesive and scattered.
|
|
|
Post by ThomasQuinn on Jul 10, 2020 11:30:19 GMT
First off, thanks to everyone for your insights and comments, they've been very interesting to read.
I've been looking at this a little further, and I'm left with more questions than answers. I've added a version of Going Back, slowed down to play two semitones lower, to the folder linked to in the first post. This one synchronizes perfectly with the snippet at the end of Mother Love - try it for yourself if you like - so clearly (and unsurprisingly), they used the 'slowed down playback'-method of changing the pitch. BUT: listening to my slowed down version, it sounds very unnatural, particularly (but not only) the vocal. Now, during the making of Mother Love, they almost certainly had access to better quality source material than I did, and presumably more know-how and maybe better tools (the latter is questionable - I think my DAW is probably at least as good as what was available professionally in '95 in terms of manipulating speed and resampling). At least some part of the unnatural sound is likely to come from the digital treatment itself. However, the extent to which it sounds, well, wrong, is out of all proportion to the version slowed down to play one semitone lower.
Listening closely to the Mother Love-snippet, it strikes me that it's buried deeper in the mix than I'd expect, and covered with sound effects that serve no real musical purpose - I strongly suspect that they've done some EQ'ing to the vocals and sort of drowned it in further sounds to cover up that it sounds a little glitchy. I would guess that it was slowed down to match the key of Mother Love.
But, this raises more questions. The version, as released, is played in the key of A major. If it were actually recorded a semitone lower, that would put it in Ab major - a less common, though far from unheard of, key in popular music - and one that's extremely unsuited to rhythm guitar. So, was the guitar part played in G major with a capo on the first fret, or was the recording actually made in G major and am I wrong about the original recording speed?
Finally, I've been thinking about the best way to approach what the recording could have sounded like slowed down to the original speed without introducing digital artifacts. I think the best way would probably be to record the version released on The Solo Collection to a reel-to-reel at the highest possible tape speed (30 ips?), and then to play it back slowed down to shift the pitch -1 semitone / -2 semitones respectively and digitally record the output. Appropriately changing the playback speed would probably be tricky, as it would probably require some customization to the player.
Does anyone here have any experience with reel-to-reel? If so, is the above a feasible approach? I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on the desirability of, and the best approach to, creating a reconstructed version of Going Back at proper speed. I still think it's probably -1 semitone, but I'm open to all possibilities!
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 10, 2020 13:03:23 GMT
personally, having given this much more thought, i'm convinced that the sped up "Goin' Back" maybe just a red herring in the discussion.
I'm wondering if the slowed down sample used in "Mother Love" came directly from the final, original sped up version of "Goin' Back"
i think the slowing down of Goin' Back is for nothing more than making it an effective blend in that little montage. I think there's a psychological aspect slowing the samples down that fit in with the "slowing down" during old age....before the final grind to a halt when we die - the song does gradually fade and die, before the baby cried. Listening again, i'm pretty sure that "One Vision intro" "TYMD" and the "Wembley '86 ey-ohs" sound slower too.
|
|
|
Post by mercurialfreddie on Jul 10, 2020 16:11:45 GMT
Dear Brenski, psychological effect or lyrical in the context of Mother Love is the secondary point here, and in contrast to your opinion - I believe that the ending of Mother Love takes us to birth, not to the death itself, Freddie's life is rewinded to its beginnings. We hear "in my youth" which is also not only slowed down but prolonged further, then we hear some birds (nature!) and baby's cry.
The main question was if it is still possible today to go to the original master tapes and return the recorded elements to their proper speed ? QPL surely could do a remix / re-take of Going Back at normal speed and pitch (of course it would be autotuned to death!)...
|
|
BrƎИsꓘi
Administrator
They called it paradise, I don't know why...You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye.
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 3,423
|
Post by BrƎИsꓘi on Jul 10, 2020 16:58:13 GMT
Dear Brenski, psychological effect or lyrical in the context of Mother Love is the secondary point here, and in contrast to your opinion - I believe that the ending of Mother Love takes us to birth, not to the death itself, Freddie's life is rewinded to its beginnings. We hear "in my youth" which is also not only slowed down but prolonged further, then we hear some birds (nature!) and baby's cry. well, discussions can be fluid. granted the discussion has moved in many directions - all valid. i referred to the baby cries already. my point being it IS about mortality and the slow-down/decline and then death. the whole point of the song itself is a yearning to feel safe again. to not be terrified of the imminent unknown. I'd even (maybe) take a punt on the first verse being about the security of his relationship with Mary, and how sick he was of the passion, rows, and promiscuity of his life after he split with her - the very stuff that brought on his early death. i think he just longs for the true companionship he had with her. then again, it's a Brian co-write, so who knows? I don't think the end of the song is rewinding us to birth, i think the point is much more metaphysical - and possibly about reincarnation. and as we know - reincarnation is not possible without dying first. the song is about death, regret and wanting a "do over". The main question was if it is still possible today to go to the original master tapes and return the recorded elements to their proper speed ? QPL surely could do a remix / re-take of Going Back at normal speed and pitch (of course it would be autotuned to death!)... the OP contains no reference to the possibility of going back to the masters. the OP was asking about what our opinions were on the two versions of the song. any comments about Mother Love - and the whys/wherefores as to the speed of the sample used, would be valid. surely?
|
|
DasTarD
Satyr
www.DasTarD.nl
Posts: 81
Likes: 51
|
Post by DasTarD on Jul 10, 2020 21:53:15 GMT
First off, thanks to everyone for your insights and comments, they've been very interesting to read. I've been looking at this a little further, and I'm left with more questions than answers. I've added a version of Going Back, slowed down to play two semitones lower, to the folder linked to in the first post. This one synchronizes perfectly with the snippet at the end of Mother Love - try it for yourself if you like - so clearly (and unsurprisingly), they used the 'slowed down playback'-method of changing the pitch. BUT: listening to my slowed down version, it sounds very unnatural, particularly (but not only) the vocal. Now, during the making of Mother Love, they almost certainly had access to better quality source material than I did, and presumably more know-how and maybe better tools (the latter is questionable - I think my DAW is probably at least as good as what was available professionally in '95 in terms of manipulating speed and resampling). At least some part of the unnatural sound is likely to come from the digital treatment itself. However, the extent to which it sounds, well, wrong, is out of all proportion to the version slowed down to play one semitone lower. Listening closely to the Mother Love-snippet, it strikes me that it's buried deeper in the mix than I'd expect, and covered with sound effects that serve no real musical purpose - I strongly suspect that they've done some EQ'ing to the vocals and sort of drowned it in further sounds to cover up that it sounds a little glitchy. I would guess that it was slowed down to match the key of Mother Love. But, this raises more questions. The version, as released, is played in the key of A major. If it were actually recorded a semitone lower, that would put it in Ab major - a less common, though far from unheard of, key in popular music - and one that's extremely unsuited to rhythm guitar. So, was the guitar part played in G major with a capo on the first fret, or was the recording actually made in G major and am I wrong about the original recording speed? Finally, I've been thinking about the best way to approach what the recording could have sounded like slowed down to the original speed without introducing digital artifacts. I think the best way would probably be to record the version released on The Solo Collection to a reel-to-reel at the highest possible tape speed (30 ips?), and then to play it back slowed down to shift the pitch -1 semitone / -2 semitones respectively and digitally record the output. Appropriately changing the playback speed would probably be tricky, as it would probably require some customization to the player. Does anyone here have any experience with reel-to-reel? If so, is the above a feasible approach? I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on the desirability of, and the best approach to, creating a reconstructed version of Going Back at proper speed. I still think it's probably -1 semitone, but I'm open to all possibilities! I to did a complete check of this song vs Mother Love. I first extract the vocals from Mother Love, then reduced speed and pitch of Goin' Back. Their speed and pitch matched beautifully and they ALMOST sound the same, so they might have a better technique and if they didn't have the mastes of Going' Back, they filtered out the piano to a minimum. Going' Back has the the piano and vocals on the left and right and the guitar in the middle, if you cancel out the middle, left and right will remain with only the vocals and piano. If you filter out the piano then slow down the speed, I think you will come a long way of duplication Mother Love. I am not sure why they pitched it to a G chord (Freddie's vocal line is in D), I think to make him sound more like a 80's Freddie instead of a 70's Freddie.
|
|